Martin Brundle shocked by Charles Leclerc’s costly move in F1 Las Vegas GP. Martin Brundle critiques Charles Leclerc’s approach to tire management in Las Vegas .

Ferrari’s Charles Leclerc was unable to replicate his impressive performance from the previous year’s Las Vegas Grand Prix during the 2024 race in Sin City on Saturday night.

Back in 2023, Charles Leclerc delivered an exceptional drive on the Las Vegas streets, coming tantalizingly close to victory behind Max Verstappen. Even Red Bull’s Adrian Newey acknowledged that the Monegasque deserved to win that race. However, this year’s event saw a very different outcome, with Charles Leclerc failing to secure a spot on the podium.

Ferrari entered the weekend aiming to close the gap to McLaren in the Constructors’ Championship, especially after both Leclerc and his teammate Carlos Sainz outqualified McLaren’s Lando Norris and Oscar Piastri. While they managed to make progress in their championship battle, the team couldn’t escape the feeling that they had left valuable points on the table due to questionable strategy decisions in the Nevada desert.

Carlos Sainz managed to finish ahead of Leclerc, though not without drama. The race included some tense radio exchanges between the Ferrari drivers and a controversial incident where Carlos Sainz cut across the pit lane entrance following a late team decision not to change his tires—a move that narrowly avoided penalty scrutiny. Both Ferrari drivers seemed to have the pace to challenge Lewis Hamilton, but their race execution left much to be desired.

Sky Sports F1 commentator Martin Brundle didn’t hold back in analyzing where Charles Leclerc’s race faltered, highlighting a key moment in his opening stint as a critical factor.

Martin Brundle critiques Charles Leclerc’s approach to tire management in Las Vegas
The Las Vegas race quickly demonstrated that a single-stop strategy wasn’t going to work for most of the grid, with tire degradation proving more severe than initially anticipated. Leclerc, in particular, struggled after a bold opening attack on George Russell. Following an aggressive start that saw him leap ahead of both Sainz and Pierre Gasly to challenge for the lead into Turn 1, his tire wear began to escalate.

Martin Brundle pointed out that Charles Leclerc’s inability to manage his tires effectively during this stint set the tone for the rest of his race. Discussing the Ferrari driver’s challenges, Martin Brundle remarked: “Karun [Chandhok] telling me at race control that Leclerc’s been told that he’s got to stay out longer, he’s damaged the tyre, but you can’t come in yet. We don’t know how far the hard compound tyre will go. So, too aggressive from Charles Leclerc. He either needed to make that move instantly or settle back behind George Russell. It’s ruined, certainly the first part of his race.” – the Sky Sports F1 commentator pointed out.

Karun Chandhok then continued: “Charles Leclerc, initially, as I said before we need to stay out, the team told him. He argued saying there’s no point despite dropping back, he made the case to pit, so that’s his call.” – the Indian former racing driver and broadcaster added.

Charles Leclerc’s Heated Exchanges Over Ferrari’s Miscommunication in Las Vegas

Charles Leclerc found himself venting his frustrations over team radio after the conclusion of the Las Vegas Grand Prix, highlighting a communication breakdown that left him blindsided by teammate Carlos Sainz’s actions late in the race.

Leclerc had not anticipated Carlos Sainz making a push to overtake him in the final stages, a move that seemingly went against Ferrari’s strategic plans. The 27-year-old expressed his irritation by suggesting to his race engineer that the team communicate with Carlos Sainz in Spanish to ensure clarity in their instructions. The comment underscored the confusion within the Ferrari camp and the lack of cohesion during the critical moments of the race.

Following the checkered flag, Charles Leclerc’s frustration boiled over into a tense and profanity-laden exchange with his engineer, Bryan Bozzi. The heated conversation reflected his dissatisfaction with how the team handled the situation and the apparent lack of alignment on race strategy.

While Ferrari have made noticeable strides in their strategic operations this season, the mishap in Las Vegas served as a stark reminder that mistakes still happen. The team’s progress was overshadowed by this misstep, which not only cost them points but also raised questions about their internal communication protocols during high-pressure scenarios.

From Lewis Hamilton’s perspective, Ferrari’s pace is undoubtedly encouraging, but he’ll be keen to see these operational issues addressed promptly. Any lingering confusion within the Maranello team could prove advantageous to their rivals, especially in tightly contested battles.

Ferrari remain committed to maintaining equality between their drivers for now, declining to designate a clear number-one driver. However, their struggles in Las Vegas highlight the pressing need for better communication and decisive instructions—no matter who is leading the charge on track.